It’s really a bigger conversation about all condo units and boards. Sometimes the reserves are chronically underfunded and purchasers of resale older units don’t know the condition. Assessments and full transparency of previous board actions would be very helpful to have as required disclosure to future purchasers.
Honestly having that sort of info available pre-escrow would be even better. Why do I have to put an offer on a condo before reviewing their reserve study? Shouldn't the study affect my offer amount?
I can’t speak for FL, but in NYC I spent three years trying to get my condo board to fix basic structural issues. I couldn’t ever win the votes needed and ultimately sold the spot and moved. The level of negligence by owners (even ones who own investment properties) is wild to me.
And when the remaining owners are finally made to pay the true cost of upkeep by disaster or government they will complain bitterly about how the system failed them.
Not a bad idea, but the purpose of the legislation is to prevent Surfside from happening again. Newer buildings were built with different regulations and brand new buildings likely have fees commiserate with their age, as they were more recently inspected.
Brand new ones are periodically inspected by the local government throughout the inspection process, and then a final time before anyone is allowed to live there. Potential buyers can also commission their own independent inspection.
It’s really a bigger conversation about all condo units and boards. Sometimes the reserves are chronically underfunded and purchasers of resale older units don’t know the condition. Assessments and full transparency of previous board actions would be very helpful to have as required disclosure to future purchasers.
Honestly having that sort of info available pre-escrow would be even better. Why do I have to put an offer on a condo before reviewing their reserve study? Shouldn't the study affect my offer amount?
I can’t speak for FL, but in NYC I spent three years trying to get my condo board to fix basic structural issues. I couldn’t ever win the votes needed and ultimately sold the spot and moved. The level of negligence by owners (even ones who own investment properties) is wild to me.
And when the remaining owners are finally made to pay the true cost of upkeep by disaster or government they will complain bitterly about how the system failed them.
Shouldn't brand new ones and old ones get more inspections (assuming bathtub curve applies to buildings), rather than uniform?
Not a bad idea, but the purpose of the legislation is to prevent Surfside from happening again. Newer buildings were built with different regulations and brand new buildings likely have fees commiserate with their age, as they were more recently inspected.
Brand new ones are periodically inspected by the local government throughout the inspection process, and then a final time before anyone is allowed to live there. Potential buyers can also commission their own independent inspection.