righthand a day ago

Is this another repurposing and bastardization of “Open” or are these actually open? Should I even be asking?

  • chii a day ago

    It is in nvidia's interest to commoditize one's complement. These models make owning and using nvidia hardware more attractive - being open and all.

    There's no incentive to "hide" the sauce.

  • jonas21 a day ago

    It's under a Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY). That's about as open as it gets.

  • hkt a day ago

    For any actual openness in released models the dataset they're trained on would have to be released as well, so yeah, it is a bastardisation.

lordofgibbons 2 days ago

This is from March. Why is it being re-posted?

  • mcs5280 a day ago

    Gotta pump NVDA shares higher

  • jasonjmcghee a day ago

    Crazy how a few months make such a difference.

    • SV_BubbleTime a day ago

      AI is in 5x historical-tech-speed-mode. So, this is kind of like posting about an iPhone 15.

      • behole a day ago

        lol! Claude told me last night, to a question about MCP confusion, that I was experiencing “AI dog years”!

        • tough a day ago

          that's funny cause a lot of AI's dont' even know yet what MCP is even

          • behole a day ago

            I remember “back in the day” when there were under 100 servers listed on glama/gh and thinking “wow this is growing quick!”. lol. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

            • tough a day ago

              the protocol spec itself has evolved rapidly as anthropic seems to have gone from side-project to taking it way more seriously as it took off

              most of the servers are meh, but some of the stuff is cool, security remains an issue but can't ask a protocol to solve everything i guess

      • amirhirsch a day ago

        lol!! but also driving this is the fact is that each new thing speeds up the development of the next thing so 5x is more like (e^t)x