duxup 3 hours ago Their CEO was terrible and had to step down until suddenly he was a great guy and now taxpayer funds go into that company? JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago Yup [1].[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-11/intel-ceo... shrubble 2 hours ago Gelsinger was their best chance to turn it around, in my view. The better results seen in the last quarter were due to Gelsinger IMHO. linksnapzz an hour ago Pat G. refused to discuss in detail the IA-64 project in a published retrospective on his career. That's...not encouraging.
JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago Yup [1].[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-11/intel-ceo...
shrubble 2 hours ago Gelsinger was their best chance to turn it around, in my view. The better results seen in the last quarter were due to Gelsinger IMHO. linksnapzz an hour ago Pat G. refused to discuss in detail the IA-64 project in a published retrospective on his career. That's...not encouraging.
linksnapzz an hour ago Pat G. refused to discuss in detail the IA-64 project in a published retrospective on his career. That's...not encouraging.
Their CEO was terrible and had to step down until suddenly he was a great guy and now taxpayer funds go into that company?
Yup [1].
[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-11/intel-ceo...
Gelsinger was their best chance to turn it around, in my view. The better results seen in the last quarter were due to Gelsinger IMHO.
Pat G. refused to discuss in detail the IA-64 project in a published retrospective on his career. That's...not encouraging.