aranw a minute ago

I've been using the minio-go client for S3-compatible storage abstraction in a project of mine. This new change putting the minio project into maintenance mode means no new features or bug fixes, which is concerning for something meant to be a stable abstraction layer

Need to start reconsidering the approach now and looking for alternatives

Havoc 18 minutes ago

I thought they were pivoting towards close it and trying to monetize this?

That got backlash so now it’s just getting dropped entirely?

People get to do whatever they want but bit jarring to go from this is worth something people will pay for to maintenance mode in quick succession

  • embedding-shape 3 minutes ago

    > I thought they were pivoting towards close it and trying to monetize this?

    That's literally what the commit shows that they're doing?

    > *This project is currently under maintenance and is not accepting new changes.*

    > For enterprise support and actively maintained versions, please see MinIO SloppyAISlop (not actual name)

  • ocdtrekkie 3 minutes ago

    They cite a proprietary alternative they offer for enterprises. So yes they pivoted to a monetized offering and are just dropping the open source one.

Dachande663 4 minutes ago

Does anyone have any recommendations for a simple S3-wrapper to a standard dir? I've got a few apps/services that can send data to S3 (or S3 compatible services) that I want to point to a local server I have, but they don't support SFTP or any of the more "primitive" solutions. I did use a python local-s3 thing, but it was... not good.

tiernano 18 minutes ago

Is this not the best thing that could happen? Like now its in maintenance, it can be forked without any potential license change in the future, or any new features that are in that license change... This allows anyone to continue working on this, right? Or did i miss something?

  • jagged-chisel 2 minutes ago

    > ... it can be forked without any potential license change in the future ...

    It is useful to remember that one may fork at the commit before a license change.

  • Weryj 3 minutes ago

    Pretty sure you can’t retroactively apply a restrictive license, so that was never a concern.

snickell 6 minutes ago

Any efforts to consolidate around a community fork yet?

ecshafer 19 minutes ago

Is this just the open source portion? Minio is now a fully paid product then?

  • 0x073 4 minutes ago

    "For enterprise support and actively maintained versions, please see MinIO AIStor."

    Probably yes.

johnmaguire 19 minutes ago

Any good alternatives?

  • import 2 minutes ago

    Seaweed and garage (tried both, still using seaweed)

  • ecshafer 13 minutes ago

    A lot of them actually. Ceph personally I've used. But there's a ton, some open source, some paid. Backblaze has a product Buckets or something. Dell powerscale. Cloudian has one. Nutanix has one.

  • itodd 15 minutes ago

    seaweedfs

  • mlnj 16 minutes ago

    Have heard good things about Garage (https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/).

    Am forced to use MinIO for certain products now but will eventually move to better eventually. Garage is high on my list of alternatives.

dardeaup 21 minutes ago

Hopefully no one is shocked or surprised.

  • giancarlostoro 18 minutes ago

    I'm both shocked and not surprised. Lots of questions: Are they doing that bad from the outcry? Or are they just keeping a private version and going completely commercial only? If so, how do they bypass the AGPL in doing so, I assume they had contributions under the AGPL.

    • 0x073 3 minutes ago

      "For enterprise support and actively maintained versions, please see MinIO AIStor."

      Commercial only, they will replace the agpl contributions from external people. (Or at least they will say that)

bananapub 10 minutes ago

for those looking for a simple and reliable self hosted S3 thing, check out Garage . it's much simpler - no web ui, no fancy RS coding, no VC-backed AI company, just some french nerds making a very solid tool.

fwiw while they do produce Docker containers for it, it's also extremely simple to run without that - it's a single binary and running it with systemd is unsurprisingly simple[1].

0: https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/

1: https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/documentation/cookbook/system...

theideaofcoffee 17 minutes ago

Oh, no! Anyway... Maybe it's for the best seeing as it's AGPL. I won't go within 39.5 feet of infected software like that, so no loss for me.